Thu Aug 18, 2016 7:25 pm
Thu Aug 18, 2016 8:59 pm
one of the reasons i take them seriously these days
Yah, unzippit it twice! Twice is gooder! That way it'll be zippyshare virus-free 1101!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
puduansave-arf.2fs.zip.zip download:
http://www62.zippyshare.com/v/BrF54rIV/file.html
Unzip twice to get the 2fs pupsave file. This pupsave is 960 Mg's big when
totally unzipped.
_________________
musher0
~~~~~~~~~~
Fri Aug 19, 2016 11:50 am
thwak wrote:Sigh, I can't "take them seriously"Yah, unzippit it twice! Twice is gooder! That way it'll be zippyshare virus-free 1101!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
puduansave-arf.2fs.zip.zip download:
http://www62.zippyshare.com/v/BrF54rIV/file.html
Unzip twice to get the 2fs pupsave file. This pupsave is 960 Mg's big when
totally unzipped.
_________________
musher0
~~~~~~~~~~
Sat Aug 20, 2016 12:48 am
Sat Aug 20, 2016 8:37 am
thwak wrote:https://github.com/antiX-Linux/Build-iso
This is probably analagous to "woof-ce", seems more straightforward, and is already road-tested (used for building MX Linux 15 and antiX 16).
Specific to devuan, IIRC devuan is stated in the /etc/issue or lsb_release file within the antiX "15-beta3-V" iso (one of my pendrives still has this).
I've never read anyone mentioning that bit of trivia, and the antix16 final iso instead states "Debian Jessie".
Mon Sep 05, 2016 1:57 am
thwak wrote:bolting a puppy liveboot+persistence mechanism onto a devuan base (reproducible builds or not) doesn't strike my fancy. Reading the current pupuan discussion thread, I was turned off by seeing "let's round up the remaining third of the packages we'll need..." along with the detail "download from zippyshare". Somewhere along the way a post mentions a desire for reproducible builds; in the meantime I wouldn't consider booting the iso due to concern for the potential risk (risk of tainted content).