If a specification fails to match at some point, this does not
necessarily mean a syntax error will be signaled; instead,
backtracking will take place until all alternatives have been
exhausted. Eventually every element of the argument list must be
matched by some element in the specification, and every required element
in the specification must match some argument.
When a syntax error is detected, it might not be reported until much
later after higher-level alternatives have been exhausted, and with the
point positioned further from the real error. But if backtracking is
disabled when an error occurs, it can be reported immediately. Note
that backtracking is also reenabled automatically in several situations;
it is reenabled when a new alternative is established by
&optional
, &rest
, or &or
, or at the start of
processing a sublist, group, or indirect specification. The effect of
enabling or disabling backtracking is limited to the remainder of the
level currently being processed and lower levels.
Backtracking is disabled while matching any of the
form specifications (that is, form
, body
, def-form
, and
def-body
). These specifications will match any form so any error
must be in the form itself rather than at a higher level.
Backtracking is also disabled after successfully matching a quoted
symbol or string specification, since this usually indicates a
recognized construct. But if you have a set of alternative constructs that
all begin with the same symbol, you can usually work around this
constraint by factoring the symbol out of the alternatives, e.g.,
["foo" &or [first case] [second case] ...]
.
Most needs are satisfied by these two ways that bactracking is
automatically disabled, but occasionally it is useful to explicitly
disable backtracking by using the gate
specification. This is
useful when you know that no higher alternatives could apply. See the
example of the let
specification.
Go to the first, previous, next, last section, table of contents.